![]() Microsoft pushes Google over the Edge, shifts browser to Chromium engine READ MORE Meanwhile, Google has bunged its own basic ad blocking into its browser. But uBlock Origin and uMatrix offer more extensive controls, without trying to placate publishers through ad whitelisting, and thus have a little more to lose.ĭon't forget, Google and other internet advertising networks pay Adblock Plus to whitelist their online adverts. The basic filtering mechanism supported by Adblock Plus should still be available to some degree. The proposed changes will diminish the effectiveness of content blocking and ad blocking extensions, though they won't entirely eliminate all ad blocking. "If this (quite limited) declarativeNetRequest API ends up being the only way content blockers can accomplish their duty, this essentially means that two content blockers I have maintained for years, uBlock Origin and uMatrix, can no longer exist," said Hill. That's fine in scenarios where Google is more trustworthy than a third-party developer but if Google and its ecosystem of publishers and advertisers are the problem, then users may prefer allowing a third-party to filter network requests, even to the extent such intervention interferes with webpage functionality. Whose privacy exactly?īut "better privacy" here means privacy as defined by Google rather than privacy defined by a third-party extension developer. ![]() "The declarativeNetRequest API provides better privacy to users because extensions can't actually read the network requests made on the user's behalf," Google's API documentation explains. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |